Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Transnational Intellectual Property Law

Nguyen, 1st Ed.

ISBN-13: 978-1634592710
ISBN-10: 1634592719
Try Quimbee for Free
  • A

    Absolute Software, Inc. v. Stealth Signal, Inc.

    659 F.3d 1121 (Fed. Cir. 2011)

    Advance Magazine Publishers Inc. v. Leach

    466 F. Supp. 2d 628 (D. Md. 2006)

    Alice Corp. Pty. Ltd. v. CLS Bank International

    134 S. Ct. 2347 (2014)

    American Broadcasting Companies, Inc. v. Aereo, Inc.

    573 U.S. 431, 134 S.Ct. 2498, 189 L.Ed.2d 476, 60 C.R. 1156, 42 Med.L.Rptr. 1885 (2014)

    American Rice Inc. v. Producers Rice Mill Inc.

    518 F.3d 321 (5th Cir. 2008)

    Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc.

    569 U.S. 576 (2013)

    A.V. ex rel. Vanderhye v. Iparadigms, LLC

    562 F.3d 630 (2009)
  • B

    Baigent v. Random House Group Ltd.

    (In the Supreme court of Judicature Court of Appeal) A3-2006/0971 [2007]EWCA Civ 247 (2007)

    Beijing Shongrui Cultural Co. Ltd. v. Beijing Zero Market Investigation & Analysis Co. Ltd.

    No. 2 Intermediate People's Court of Beijing Municipality (Model Court of Judicial Openness) (1998)
  • C

    Case of an Appeal Filed for the Principal Action Seeking an Injunction Against Patent Infringement, etc. and an Appeal Filed for the Counterclaim Seeking Damages

    2012 (Ne) 10015, Date of Rendition of Judgment: 2013

    Case X (Nissan)

    ECJ Case C-373/90 (2010)

    Chef America, Inc. v. Lamb-Weston, Inc.

    358 F.3d 1371 (Fed. Cir. 2004)

    Community for Creative Non-violence v. Reid

    846 F.2d 1485 Aff'd, 490 U.S. 730, 109 S.Ct. 2166 (1989)

    Coty Prestige Lancaster Group GmbH v. Simex Trading AG (C-127/09)

    ECJ Fourth Chamber (2010)

    Court of Justice of the European Union Press Release No. 112/11

    Luxembourg Press and Information Judgment in Case C-34/10, Oliver Brüstle v Greenpeace e.V. (2011)

    Court of Justice of the European Union Press Release No. 24/10

    Luxembourg Advocate General's Opinion in Case C-428/08, Monsanto Technology LLC v Cefetra BV and Others (2010)

    Crocs, Inc. v. International Trade Commission

    598 F.3d 1294 (2010)
  • E

    E.T. Browne Drug Co. v. Cococare Products, Inc.

    538 F.3d 185 (3rd Cir. 2008)

    European Central Bank v. Document Security Systems Incorporated (USA)

    [2008] EWCA Civ 192, Case No: A3/2007/0879 (2008)

    Eva-Maria Painer v. Standard Verlags GmbH

    Case C-145/10 (ECJ) (2011)

    Excerpt from Stylianos Malliaris, Protecting Famous Trademarks: Comparative Analysis of US and EU Diverging Approaches—The Battle Between Legislatures and the Judiciary, Who Is the Ultimate Judge?

    9 Chi.-Kent J. Intell. Prop. 45 & 55 (2010)
  • G

    Gaylord v. United States

    595 F.3d 1364 (Fed. Cir. 2010)

    Global-Tech Appliances, Inc. v. SEB S.A.

    563 U.S. 754, 98 U.S.P.Q.2d 1665 (2011)

    Google France SARL v. Louis Vuitton Malletier SA

    [2010] E.T.M.R. 30, C-236/08, C-237/08, C-238/08 (2010)

    Group One, Ltd. v. Hallmark Cards, Inc.

    254 F.3d 1041, 59 USPQ2d 1121 (2001)
  • H

    Hangzhou Wahaha Group Company v. Zhuhai Giant Hi-Tech Group Company

    Hangzhou City Intermediate People's Court of Zhejiang Province (Model Court for Judicial Openness) (1996)

    Hokto Kinoko Co. v. Concord Farms, Inc.

    738 F.3d 1085 (9th Cir. 2013)

    Hong Kong Meiyi Metal Products Factory v. Patent Reexamination Board of the Patent Office of China


    Hubei Wushi Pharmaceuticals Group Co., Ltd. v. Aonuo (China) Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd. and Wang Junshe

    A Case of Disputes over Invention Patent Infringement Supreme People's Court (2010)
  • I

    Infopaq International A/S v. Danske Dagblades Forening

    C-5/08 July 16 2009 (ECJ Fourth Chamber) (2009)

    In re Manhattan Portage Device Mark

    Tokyo High Court H14 (Gyoke) No. 514 (2002)

    Intel Corporation Inc. v. CPM United Kingdon Ltd. (C-252/07)

    ECJ First Chamber (2008)

    Intellectual Property High Court Case Number 2009 (Ju) 788

    Judgment of January 27 2009

    Interpretation of the Supreme People's Court on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Law to the Trial of Patent Dispute Cases

    (Adopted on 19 June 2001 at the 1180th Meeting of the Adjudication Committee of the Supreme People's Court) (2001)

    In the Patent Nullity Case Concerning European Patent 0 907 364 (DE 697 14 739)

    3 Ni 43/10(EP) Conjoined with 3NI 24/11(EU) and 3 Ni25/11 (EU)
  • J

    JAR Labratories LLC v. Great American E & S Insurance Company

    945 F. Supp. 2d 937 (N.D. Ill. 2013)

    JCW Investments, Inc. v. Novelty, Inc.

    482 F.3d 910 (7th Cir. 2007)

    Jing Brand Co., Ltd. v. Trademark Appeal Board of the State Administration for Industry and Commerce

    The Supreme People's Court 2010

    Ju County Winery v. Wendeng Brewery Factory

    Higher People's Court of Shandong Province (1990)

    Judgment Concerning the Meaning of the Phrase "Provision of Information Concerning Sales of Goods," Specified in Class 35(III) of the Appended Table of the Ordinance for Enforcement of the Trademark Act (Prior to the Revision by Ordinance of the Ministry

    Supreme Court of Japan 2009 (Gyo-Hi) No. 217, Reporter Minshu Vol. 65 No. 9 (2011)

    Judgment of the First Petit Bench, Date of the Judgment 1997.07.17

    Case number 1992(O) No.1443 (1992)

    Judgment of the First Petty Bench, Date of the Judgment 2011.12.08

    Case number 2009 (Ju) No. 602 & 603 (2009)

    Judgment on the Case Where Products of Another Person Was Found to Be Within the Technical Scope of the Patented Invention for Being Identical in Construction as Indicated in the Scope of Claim in the Patient Specification

    1994(O)No. 1083 Japan Supreme Court (1998)

    Judgments of Intellectual Property High Court, Fourth Division

    Date of the Judgment: 2006.3.29, Case Number: 2005(Ne)No.10094

    Judgment Upholding a Decision of Revocation in an Opposition Procedure by the Patent Office, in Which the Recitations of a Claimed Invention Do Not Comply with Statutory Requirement (Support Requirement) In Article 36, Paragraph 1, Item 5 of Patent Law Th

    2005 (Gyo-Ke)No. 10042, Judgments of Intellectual Property High Court (Grand Panel) (2005)

    Judgment upon Case Concerning the Conducting of a Test Needed for the Application of So-Called Following Pharmaceutical Products for the Approval Provided by Art.14 of the Law on Pharmaceutical Business and "Working of a Patented Invention for Testing or

    1998(Ju)No.153 Japan Supreme Court (1999)

    Judgment upon Case Concerning the Effect That "Trademarks That Entail the Risk of Confusion with Products or Services Relating to the Business of Another Party" as Referred to in Article 4, Para.2, Subpara.15 of the Trademark Law Include Trademarks That R

    Supreme Court of Japan Case number 1998 (Gyo-hi) No. 85 (2000)

    Judgment upon the Case Concerning Lack of Illegality in Parallel Importation as Violation of Trademark Right (February 27, 2003)

    1924 P.C.I.J. Ser.A No. 2 (Judgment of Aug. 30, 1924)
  • K

    Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

    568 U.S. 519, 133 S.Ct. 1351 (2013)

    K.K.I.C.M. v. K.K. Mets

    Case No. Heisei 1 (yo)-2577 (1991)
  • L

    Leadsinger, Inc. v. BMG Music Publishing

    512 F.3d 522 (9th Cir. 2008)

    Lee v. A.R.T. Co.

    125 F.3d 580 (1997)

    Leno Merken BV v. Hagelkruis Beheer BV (C-149/11)

    ECJ Second Chamber (2012)

    Limelight Networks, Inc. v. Akamai Technologies, Inc.

    200 U. S. 321 (2014)

    L'Oréal SA v. eBay International

    AG (C-324/09) ECJ Grand Chamber (2011)
  • M

    Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios v. Grokster

    518 F. Supp.2d 1197 (C. D. Cal. 2007)

    Monsanto Technology LLC v. Cefetra BV.

    [2010] ERC I-06761, C-428/08 (2010)
  • O

    Obtaining Patent Rights in China

    (Excerpt from Grace Pan, Obtaining and Enforcing Patent Rights in the People's Republic of China, 2013 WL 4192385 (2013)

    Octane Fitness, LLC v. ICON Health & Fitness, Inc.

    572 U.S. 545 (2014)

    Oliver Brüstle v. Greenpeace

    Case C-34/10, EU:C:2011:669 (2011)

    Opinion of Mr Advocate General Tesauro Delivered on 24 October 1991.—Criminal Proceedings Against X.—Reference for a Preliminary Ruling: Tribunal de Grande Instance de Bergerac—France.—Motor Vehicles—Misleading Advertising.—Case C-373/90

    European Court reports 1992 Page I-00131
  • "

    "Palm Spring Polo Club" Case

    Supreme Court of Japan Hei 12 (Gyo-hi) No. 172 (2001)
  • P

    Patent-Related Proceedings

    Excerpt from David Hill and Shinichi Murata, Patent Litgation in japan, 1 Akron Intell. Prop. J. 141 (2007)

    Perfect Web Technologies, Inc. v. InfoUSA, Inc.

    587 F.3d 1324 (Fed Cir. 2010)

    Peter Pinckney v. KDG Mediatech AG

    Case C-170/12 (2012)
  • Q

    Qian Zhongshu and People's Publishing House v. Xu Zhifen and Sichuan Literature & Artspublishing House

    Shanghai Higher People's Court (1996)

    Qualitex Co. v. Jacobson Products Co.

    514 U.S. 159 (1995)
  • R

    Rugao Printing Machinery Factory v. Yide Company

    Nantong City Intermediate People's Court of Jiangsu Province (2003)
  • S

    Saikō Saibansho [Supreme Court of Japan] Apr. 11, 2000

    Hei 10 (o) no. 364, 54 SAIKO SAIBANSHO MINJI HANREISHU [MINSHU] 1368 (2000)

    Sanofi v. Actavis (Germany)

    4a 0 109/12, Civil Division 4a of the Düsseldorf Regional Court (2012)

    SAS Institute Inc. v. World Programming Ltd.

    Case C-406/10 (2012)

    Scarlet Extended SA v. Société Belge des Auteurs, Composteurs et éditeurs SCRL (SABAM)

    Case C-70/10 (2011)

    Shengzhen Triangle Science & Technology Industrial Co., Ltd. and Ma Xiguang v. Compaq Computer Corp. of the United States

    Higher People's Court of Beijing (2002)

    Société des produits Nestlé SA v. Mars UK Ltd. (C-353/03)

    ECJ (2005)

    Specsavers International Healthcare Ltd. v. Asda Stores Ltd. (C-252/12)

    ECJ Third Chamber (2013)

    Spectralytics, Inc. v. Cordis Corp.

    649 F.3d 1336 (Fed. Cir. 2011)

    Starbucks Corporation and Shanghai President Coffee Corporation v. Shanghai Starbucks Cafe Company Limited and Shanghai Starbucks Cafe Company Limited, Nanjing Road Branch

    The Higher People's Court of Shanghai Municipality (Model Court for Judicial Openness) (2006)
  • T

    The Authors Guild, Inc. v. HathiTrust

    755 F.3d 87 (2d Cir. 2014)

    The Forschner Group, Inc. and Swiss Army Brands, Ltd. v. Arrow Trading Co., Inc.

    904 F. Supp. 1409 (S.D.N.Y. 1995)

    The Japanese Supreme Court's Decision in Kilby (2000)

    Excerpt from Yoshinari Oyama, Standard of Proof for Patent Invalidation in the U.S. and Japan, 13 Chi.-Ken J. Int'l & Comp. L. 1 (2012-2013)

    The Judgment Concerning Whether or Not the Patent Owner Who Has Granted an Exclusive License Is Allowed to Claim Injunction Based on the Patent Right

    2004 (Ju) No. 9997, Minshu Vol. 59 No. 5 (2005)

    The North Korea Case

    Supreme Court of Japan 2009 (Ju) 602 & 603 (2011)

    The Walt Disney Co., U.S. v. Beijing Publishing Press, etc.

    Beijing Higher People's Court; SPC Gazette Issue 4 1996 (1995)

    The Yomiuri Online Case

    Intellectual Property High Court 2005 (Ne) 10049 (2006)

    Tiffany (NJ), Inc. v. eBay, Inc.

    600 F.3d 93 (2d Cir. 2010)

    Turner Entertainment Co. v. Huston

    Decision No. 68 Roll No. 615/92 December 19 1994, 16 Ent. L. Rptr. 10:3 (1995), Ent. L. Rep. Mar. 1995 (1994)

    Two Pesos, Inc. v. Taco Cabana, Inc.

    505 U.S. 763 (1992)
  • X

    Xu Wenqing v. The Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences of the State Intellectual Property Office, and Xing Pengwan

    Supreme People's Court 2005
  • Y

    YakultHonsha Co., Ltd. v. JPO Commissioner

    Intellectual Property High Court, 2010 (Gyoke) No. 10169 (2010)
  • Z

    Zhang Linying and Other Three Persons v. Guangyuan Co., Ltd., Chinese Revolutionary Museum and Gongmei Corp. Group

    Beijing Higher People's Court (2002)

    Zhao Jikang v. Qujing Cigarette Plant

    The Yunnan Province Higher People's Court's Civil Judgment No. Yungaominsanzhongzi 16/2003 (2003)

= Case has been assigned to a writer and is coming soon.