College Savings Bank v. Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board
United States Supreme Court
527 U.S. 666 (1999)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
The Trademark Remedy Clarification Act (TRCA) permitted trademark owners to sue states under the Lanham Act. College Savings Bank (plaintiff), a New Jersey bank, sued Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board (defendant), an arm of Florida’s state government, for false advertising under the Lanham Act. College Savings claimed that it had two property interests at issue: (1) the right of a business to be free from a competitor’s false advertising, and (2) the right “to be secure in one’s business interests.” The United States District Court for the District of New Jersey dismissed the complaint based on the State of Florida’s sovereign immunity. The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit affirmed. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Scalia, J.)
Dissent (Stevens, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.