From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.
Commonwealth v. DiGiacomo
Pennsylvania Supreme Court
345 A.2d 605 (1975)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Marlo DiGiacomo (defendant) was charged with murder. DiGiacomo claimed that the killing was justified because the deceased was in the process of beating DiGiacomo’s friend John Hruska at the time. At trial, DiGiacomo sought to introduce Hruska’s hospital records to prove his diagnosis and the extent of his injuries. The trial court excluded the records for this purpose because the doctor who made the diagnosis was unavailable to testify. The trial court did permit the records to be introduced to prove that Hruska was hospitalized and to prove the duration of his stay. DiGiacomo was convicted, and he appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Nix, J.)
Concurrence (Pomeroy, J.)
Concurrence (Roberts, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
