Coty Prestige Lancaster Group GmbH v. Simex Trading AG

Case C-127/09 (2010)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Coty Prestige Lancaster Group GmbH v. Simex Trading AG

European Union Court of Justice
Case C-127/09 (2010)

Facts

German company Coty Prestige Lancaster Group GmbH (Coty Prestige) (plaintiff) manufactured and marketed perfumes under its own trademarked brands as well as those of third parties. Coty Prestige had authorized specialist dealers around the world for whom it provided perfume-tester bottles. These bottles, which were explicitly marked as not for sale, were intended to be used for demonstration or advertising purposes. Swiss company Simex Trading AG (defendant) imported test bottles from authorized dealers of Coty Prestige located in Singapore and the Middle East. Simex Trading then placed these bottles for sale in Germany. Coty Prestige sought an injunction against Simex Trading in the German court system. Simex Trading responded by arguing that Coty Prestige’s trademark-based rights in the test bottles were exhausted—that is, lost—when Coty Prestige made the bottles available to dealers outside the European Economic Area (EEA). The German court agreed with Simex Trading’s argument. Coty Prestige appealed. The appeals court referred the matter to the European Union Court of Justice for a preliminary ruling.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership