DeAngelis v. El Paso Municipal Police Officers Association

51 F.3d 591 (1995)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

DeAngelis v. El Paso Municipal Police Officers Association

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
51 F.3d 591 (1995)

  • Written by Galina Abdel Aziz , JD

Facts

Sylvia DeAngelis (plaintiff) became the first female sergeant at the El Paso Police Department in October 1987. An anonymous writer, who was known as R. U. Withmi, satirized DeAngelis in The Silver Badge, a newsletter distributed by the El Paso Municipal Police Officers Association (police association) (defendant). Between November 1987 and February 1990, R. U. Withmi derogatorily referred to policewomen and angered more than 24 female police officers. R.U. Withmi called DeAngelis a “dingy woman” and ridiculed her “E-I-E-I-O” complaint, which referred to her Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) complaint. The female police officers asked the police chief to stifle R. U. Withmi, but the police chief had no direct authority over the police association. Additionally, the police association refused to require R. U. Withmi to unmask himself. The female police officers were given the opportunity to respond to R. U. Withmi, but none of them did. DeAngelis sued the police association under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Jones, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership