Deyle v. Deyle
North Dakota Supreme Court
825 N.W.2d 245 (2012)
![SC](https://quimbee-production.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/educator/photo/11/Sean_Carroll.webp)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Christina Deyle (plaintiff) and Eric Deyle (defendant) were married with two children. The couple separated, and Christina was the children’s primary caretaker during the separation. Eric moved out while Christina remained in the marital home. When Eric stopped making mortgage payments, the home went into foreclosure and Christina moved with the children into her parents’ house. Christina planned to go back to school to become a dental hygienist and then search for a job as a dental hygienist. Christina petitioned for divorce, and the district court granted Eric primary residential responsibility of the children. The district court found that Christina would need to move two or three times in the near future and that such upheaval would not be in the best interests of the children. Christina appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Crothers, J.)
Dissent (Maring, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.