Dodson v. Dubose Steel, Inc.

582 S.E.2d 389, 159 N.C. App. 1 (2003)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Dodson v. Dubose Steel, Inc.

North Carolina Court of Appeals
582 S.E.2d 389, 159 N.C. App. 1 (2003)

Facts

John Dodson was employed by Dubose Steel, Inc. (Dubose) (defendant) as a long-distance truck driver. While driving a truck for Dubose, Dodson had to merge from the right lane into the left lane. Dubose merged into the left lane, where Troy Campbell, who had no previous relationship with Dubose, was driving. Dubose merged into the left lane despite Campbell’s honking and yelling, and Dubose’s merging truck forced Campbell into a turn lane. At the next stoplight, Campbell yelled at Dodson for almost hitting him. At the following stoplight, Dodson exited his truck, walked up to Campbell’s vehicle, and yelled at Campbell to get out of the vehicle while hitting the hood of Campbell’s vehicle. Campbell hit Dodson with his car while attempting to drive away, killing Dodson. Dodson’s widow, Shelby Dodson (plaintiff), filed a claim for workers’-compensation death benefits. The North Carolina Industrial Commission (the commission) found that the claim was compensable. The commission concluded that the root cause of the dispute between Campbell and Dodson was Dodson’s merging while performing his duties for Dubose, and Dodson’s death was from an assault that originated while Dodson was performing his duties. The commission further concluded that as a long-distance truck driver, Dodson had an increased risk for road-rage incidents and being hit by another vehicle. Dubose appealed, arguing that Dodson’s injuries did not arise out of his employment because they were a result of personal conduct, and that the claim was therefore barred by a North Carolina statute prohibiting the payment of death benefits if the worker’s death was proximately caused by the worker’s willful intention to injure or kill another person.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Hudson, J.)

Concurrence/Dissent (Steelman, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership