Elkus v. Elkus
Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division
572 N.Y.S.2d 901 (1991)
Frederica von Stade Elkus (plaintiff), a successful and famous opera singer, married her husband (defendant) in 1973. At the time, she had just started her career, taking on small roles. In the first year of marriage, she earned $2,250. During the marriage, Mr. Elkus gave up his own career to travel with his wife, observe and critique her performances, and serve as a voice coach and teacher, as well as to take care of their two children. Ms. Von Stade became a success, headlining shows and travelling around the world. In 1989, her income was $621,878. The trial court held that Mr. Elkus’s contributions did not constitute marital property. Mr. Elkus appealed to the Appellate Division.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Rosenberger, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 705,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 705,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 44,300 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.