Equitable Lumber Corp. v. IPA Land Development Corp.
New York Court of Appeals
381 N.Y.S.2d 459 (1976)

- Written by Rich Walter, JD
Facts
Equitable Lumber Corporation (plaintiff) entered into a sales contract with the president of IPA Land Development Corporation (defendant). The president was also an experienced New York lawyer. The contract’s liquidated-damages clause stipulated, in italics, that if IPA defaulted on payments, IPA would pay damages equal to 30 percent of whatever a collections attorney managed to recover on Equitable’s behalf. IPA breached the contract, and Equitable successfully sued it for damages. However, the trial judge ruled that an unmodified award of liquidated damages would be disproportionate given the minimal work Equitable’s attorney actually performed. The judge lowered the damages award from 30 to 11 percent. On appeal, an intermediate court raised that amount somewhat but otherwise affirmed the trial court. Equitable appealed to the New York Court of Appeals.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Gabrielli, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 966,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,500 briefs, keyed to 1,007 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
- AI-generated podcast version of every brief — listen on the go, between classes, or whenever reading isn’t an option. New
Understand your casebook readings in seconds
Use our case briefs to comprehend your casebook readings faster, supplement your notes and outlines, and outshine your peers in class.
Get instant access to over 47,500+ expert-written case briefs in a searchable database keyed to 1,007 law school casebooks.

