Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status
From our private database of 15,400+ case briefs...

Estate of Hanau v. Hanau

Texas Supreme Court
730 S.W.2d 663 (1987)


Facts

In 1974, Robert and Dorris Hanau (defendant) were married in Illinois. In 1979, the couple moved to Texas. During that interim five-year period, Robert acquired significant stock with his separate property. Under Illinois law, the stocks were classified as separate property. Robert’s will left his separate property to his children of a previous marriage. Robert’s son, Steven (plaintiff), filed a petition seeking to have Dorris removed as executrix of the estate. Thereafter, Dorris sought a ruling that Texas courts should classify the stocks as marital property. The trial court granted Dorris partial summary judgment. The court of appeals affirmed in part and reversed in part. Both parties appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Robertson, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 321,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 15,400 briefs, keyed to 210 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.