Estate of Hanau v. Hanau
Texas Supreme Court
730 S.W.2d 663 (1987)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
In 1974, Robert and Dorris Hanau (defendant) were married in Illinois. In 1979, the couple moved to Texas. During that interim five-year period, Robert acquired significant stock with his separate property. Under Illinois law, the stocks were classified as separate property. Robert’s will left his separate property to his children of a previous marriage. Robert’s son, Steven (plaintiff), filed a petition seeking to have Dorris removed as executrix of the estate. Thereafter, Dorris sought a ruling that Texas courts should classify the stocks as marital property. The trial court granted Dorris partial summary judgment. The court of appeals affirmed in part and reversed in part. Both parties appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Robertson, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.