Court of Appeal of California
236 Cal. Rptr. 368 (1987)
Jeanne Pritchard (plaintiff) and William Logan were married in 1947 and divorced in 1966. During their marriage, William had a group-term life-insurance plan through his employer. At the time the parties were divorced, William was still insurable. The divorce order required that William maintain that term life-insurance policy with his children named as beneficiaries until William's children (defendants) were adults. When William died in 1984, the life-insurance policy named William's children, now adults, as the beneficiaries. Jeanne filed suit for a portion of the life-insurance proceeds under the theory that the proceeds were community-property assets. The trial court found that the proceeds were separate property and were payable in full to William's children. Jeanne appealed the trial court's decision.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (King, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 222,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.