Etienne v. DKM Enterprises, Inc.

136 Cal. App. 3d 487, 186 Cal. Rptr. 321 (1982)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Etienne v. DKM Enterprises, Inc.

California Court of Appeal
136 Cal. App. 3d 487, 186 Cal. Rptr. 321 (1982)

Facts

Common-law spouses Raphel Etienne and Bobby Etienne (plaintiffs) filed suit after Raphel injured his arm while cutting down a tree made by DKM Enterprises, Inc. (defendant). Four causes of action in the complaint focused on Raphel Etienne and the injuries from the accident. The fifth and sixth causes of action were a claim on behalf of Bobby Etienne for negligent infliction of emotional distress and for loss of consortium. DKM Enterprises filed a motion for summary judgment related to the fifth and sixth causes of action, arguing Raphel Etienne and Bobby Etienne were not legally married. The trial court granted the motion, finding the evidence provided by Raphel Etienne and Bobby Etienne was insufficient as a matter of law to establish a common-law marriage under Texas law. Bobby Etienne appealed the trial court decision related to the summary judgment on the fifth and sixth causes.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Puglia, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership