Eva-Maria Painer v. Standard Verlags GmbH

Case C-145/10 (2011)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Eva-Maria Painer v. Standard Verlags GmbH

European Union Court of Justice
Case C-145/10 (2011)

Facts

Eva-Maria Painer (plaintiff) was a freelance photographer specializing in portrait photos of children. One of the children whom Painer photographed, a 10-year-old girl, was abducted. After authorities launched a search and requested the help of the public, various newspapers in Germany and Austria printed the photos taken by Painer as well as a computer-created image based on one of Painer’s photos. These publications were made without Painer’s consent or attribution. Painer brought suit against Vienna-based newspaper publisher Standard Verlags GmbH as well as various German publishers (the newspapers) (defendants), seeking a court order that the newspapers cease publication and distribution of the photos and the computer-generated image. The court entertained the opinion that the photo used as the basis for the computer image was entitled to a lesser degree of protection than other copyrighted works because it involved relatively little creative effort on Painer’s part. However, rather than ruling on the issue, the court requested a preliminary ruling from the European Union Court of Justice.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership