F.G. v. MacDonell
New Jersey Supreme Court
696 A.2d 697 (1997)
- Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD
Facts
Rector Alex MacDonell (defendant) induced F.G. (plaintiff), a parishioner who consulted him for counseling, to engage in an extramarital sexual relationship. Eventually F.G. told assistant rector Harper (defendant) about the misconduct and sought counseling from him instead. After F.G. raised “the possibility of notifying the parishes” about the misconduct, Harper allegedly induced her to consent to disclose her name to the congregation, then disclosed her name in letters and sermons that mischaracterized MacDonell’s conduct and the nature of their relationship. F.G. brought a lawsuit that included claims for negligent pastoral counseling, negligent infliction of emotional distress, and breach of fiduciary duty against both MacDonell and Harper. The trial court dismissed the claims for clergy malpractice and breach of fiduciary duty, but the appellate court reversed, prompting an appeal to the New Jersey Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Pollock, J.)
Dissent (O’Hern, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.