Fashion Boutique of Short Hills, Inc. v. Fendi USA, Inc.

1998 WL 259942 (1998)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Fashion Boutique of Short Hills, Inc. v. Fendi USA, Inc.

United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
1998 WL 259942 (1998)

SC

Facts

Beginning in 1983, Fashion Boutique of Short Hills, Inc. (Fashion Boutique) (plaintiff) sold products manufactured by Fendi USA, Inc. (Fendi) (defendant). In 1989, Fendi opened a retail store on Fifth Avenue in New York City. After Fendi opened the store, Fashion Boutique experienced declining sales and eventually closed. Fashion Boutique subsequently sued Fendi for business disparagement, alleging that Fendi employees at the Fifth Avenue store had misrepresented to customers that Fashion Boutique sold fake or inferior Fendi merchandise. Fashion Boutique presented evidence that before Fashion Boutique closed, Fendi employees told several shoppers about the supposedly inferior nature of Fashion Boutique’s products. The alleged comments were often unsolicited in that the customer was not asking about the quality of the products at Fashion Boutique. Fashion Boutique also presented evidence that those shoppers then stopped shopping at Fashion Boutique. Fendi moved for summary judgment, arguing that there was no material dispute that the statements by the Fendi employees were not made with malice.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Cedarbaum, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership