Fenn v. Lockwood

136 Wash. App. 1017 (2006)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Fenn v. Lockwood

Washington Court of Appeals
136 Wash. App. 1017 (2006)

  • Written by Liz Nakamura, JD

Facts

Frieda Fenn (plaintiff) and John Lockwood (defendant) began cohabitating in 1986 with the intent of starting a family. In 1987, Fenn and Lockwood hosted a commitment ceremony; both understood the ceremony was not a marriage. In 1988, Fenn and Lockwood’s daughter, Freya Fennwood, was born. During the early years of Fenn and Lockwood's cohabitation, Lockwood started Pygmy Boats, a kayak company, which he described as a family business. Lockwood ran the business, and Fenn took care of the household and raised Freya. In 1997, Fenn and Lockwood acquired a property in Port Townsend, Washington. Pursuant to a written agreement, ownership was divided 41.5 percent to Fenn and 58.5 percent to Lockwood. In 2002, Fenn and Lockwood permanently separated, and Fenn subsequently filed for an equitable distribution of community property. The trial court found that Fenn and Lockwood were in a meretricious relationship and divided their community property, giving Fenn 45 percent and Lockwood 55 percent. The Port Townsend property was included in the pool of community property. Although Lockwood had a significantly higher income than Fenn, the trial court justified the unequal division because Fenn was 14 years younger, Lockwood was imminently planning to retire, and Pygmy Boats was Lockwood’s creation and avocation. Lockwood appealed, arguing that (1) he was not in a meretricious relationship with Fenn and (2) the trial court erred by classifying the Port Townsend property as community property. Fenn cross-appealed to challenge the distribution percentages.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Bridgewater, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership