Finn v. Finn

658 S.W.2d 735 (1983)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Finn v. Finn

Texas Court of Appeals
658 S.W.2d 735 (1983)

  • Written by Whitney Kamerzel , JD

Facts

Frank Finn (defendant) practiced law at a large law firm during his marriage to Joellen Finn (plaintiff). For the last 10 years of his marriage, Frank was a senior partner at the law firm. Joellen also had a law degree but did not practice law and instead raised her and Frank’s children. Although Frank’s partnership agreement specified the compensation owed to a partner if the partner voluntarily withdrew from the law firm, the partnership agreement did not permit a withdrawing partner to be compensated for the firm’s goodwill. The law firm employed over 85 lawyers and had been providing legal services to the public for more than 90 years. When Frank and Joellen decided to divorce and asked the court to determine the community-property estate, the trial court instructed the jury to exclude the goodwill of the law firm and Frank’s future earning capacity from the valuation of the community interest in Frank’s law practice. Joellen appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Vance, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership