Fridman v. Orbis Business Intelligence Ltd.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
229 A.3d 494 (2020)
- Written by Nathan Benedict, JD
Facts
Orbis Business Intelligence Limited (Orbis) (defendant) conducted opposition research on Donald Trump during the 2016 presidential election campaign. Orbis compiled 17 company intelligence reports (CIRs), some of which documented connections between Trump and Russia. CIR 112 described a relationship between Alfa Group, a Russian business, and Russian President Vladimir Putin, including allegations of bribery and blackmail. Mikhail Fridman, Petr Aven, and German Khan (plaintiffs) (the owners) owned Alfa Group and were mentioned by name in the report. Prior to the publication of CIR 112, other news articles had covered the relationship between the owners and Putin, and the owners had given interviews espousing their views about their involvement with the Russian government. The owners sued Orbis for defamation. Orbis moved to dismiss under the District of Columbia Anti-SLAPP Act. The trial court found that the Anti-SLAPP Act applied because CIR 112 discussed matters of public interest and because the owners were limited-purpose public figures. As public figures, the owners needed to demonstrate actual malice to prevail on a defamation claim, which they had failed to do. The District of Columbia Superior Court dismissed the suit. The owners appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Fisher, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 954,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,400 briefs, keyed to 1,005 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
- AI-generated podcast version of every brief — listen on the go, between classes, or whenever reading isn’t an option. New

