Gappelberg v. Landrum
Texas Court of Appeals
654 S.W.2d 549 (1984)
- Written by Tom Syverson, JD
Facts
Nathan Gappelberg (plaintiff) bought a big-screen television from Neely Landrum, who was doing business as The Video Station (defendant). Shortly after the sale, Gappelberg informed Landrum that the television screen was damaged. Gappelberg reported other defects over the next couple days. Landrum sent repairmen to fix the defects, but the television soon stopped working entirely. Landrum’s repairmen never fixed the television, and Gappelberg notified Landrum that the Gappelberg was revoking acceptance of the television. Landrum responded by offering Gappelberg a replacement television, but Gappelberg refused the replacement. Gappelberg sued Landrum for damages. The trial court denied relief to Gappelberg because Gappelberg refused Landrum’s offer of a replacement television. Gappelberg appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Storey, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.