Giha v. Giha

609 A.2d 945 (1992)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 36,900+ case briefs...

Giha v. Giha

Rhode Island Supreme Court

609 A.2d 945 (1992)

Facts

Nagib Giha (plaintiff) initiated divorce proceedings against Nelly Giha (defendant). The parties agreed that Nagib would retain the income from his medical practice. Nagib and Nelly’s agreement was reflected in an interlocutory order to the same effect. Later that year, Nagib won the lottery with a ticket worth $2.4 million. Six months later, the family court entered its final judgment. Nelly then filed a complaint for postjudgment relief, asserting the $2.4 million prize was a marital asset that Nagib fraudulently failed to disclose to the family court. The trial judge dismissed Nelly’s complaint. Nelly appealed. The Rhode Island Supreme Court granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Fay, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 629,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 629,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 36,900 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 629,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 36,900 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership