Graham v. Graham
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
33 F. Supp. 936 (1940)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Margrethe Graham (defendant) and Sidney Graham (plaintiff) were married. Sidney had a job and wished to keep working, but Margrethe wished to travel and for Sidney to accompany her. Accordingly, the Grahams signed a contract under which Margrethe agreed to pay Sidney $300 per month until they decided to end the arrangement. Effectively, the result of the contract was that Sidney would quit his job, travel with Margrethe, and be paid by Margrethe for doing so. Subsequently, the Grahams were divorced. Sidney brought suit, seeking enforcement of the contract.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Tuttle, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 807,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.