From our private database of 33,600+ case briefs...
Gross v. Gross
Ohio Supreme Court
11 Ohio St. 3d 99, 464 N.E.2d 500 (1984)
Prior to getting married, Thomas Gross (defendant) and Ida Gross (plaintiff) executed an antenuptial (or prenuptial) agreement. Among other provisions, the agreement stipulated that in the event of a divorce, alimony payments to Ida would be limited to no more than $200 per month,. Thomas accrued significant wealth during the marriage. After 14 years, Ida filed for divorce on the ground of extreme cruelty. Although the divorce was granted, the trial court found the prenuptial agreement enforceable. Ida appealed. The appellate court ruled that prenuptial agreements were not enforceable if the party seeking enforcement is also found to be the party at fault in the divorce. Thomas appealed. The Ohio Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Holmes, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 602,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 602,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 33,600 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.