H.M. v. E.T.
New York Supreme Court
76 A.D.3d 528 (2010)
- Written by Brittany Frankel, JD
Facts
H.M. (plaintiff) is from Canada and is the biological mother of a child conceived by artificial insemination through a donor. H.M. was in a same-sex relationship with E.T. (defendant). H.M. alleges that when she made the decision to conceive the child, she relied upon E.T.’s promise to support the child. H.M. and E.T. separated, and H.M. filed a child-support petition, pursuant to the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act, to obtain support from E.T. The family court held in favor of H.M. and ordered E.T. to pay child support under the principle of equitable estoppel. Ultimately, the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York took up the question of whether H.M. had a cause of action for child support against E.T.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning ()
What to do next…
Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.