Hammontree v. National Labor Relations Board
United States Circuit Court for the District of Columbia Circuit
925 F.2d 1486 (1991)
- Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD
Facts
Paul Hammontree (plaintiff) drove trucks for Consolidated Freightways (CF) (defendant) and belonged to the Teamsters Union. CF’s collective-bargaining agreement (CBA) required it to maintain practices that favored the union and prohibited discrimination based on unionism. Hammontree filed a grievance claiming that CF’s assignment of short-run drives called “peddle runs” violated his seniority rights. The grievance committee sustained the grievance and awarded Hammontree damages. Shortly afterward, CF stopped posting the peddle-run departure times. Hammontree filed another grievance, claiming CF violated the maintenance-of-standards provision, but the committee denied it at the first step of the process. Instead of appealing to the second step, Hammontree filed unfair-labor-practice charges with the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), claiming CF removed the departure times to retaliate against him. But the NLRB deferred, finding Hammontree had to first exhaust the grievance and arbitration procedure. Hammontree appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Wald, J.)
Concurrence (Edwards, J.)
Dissent (Mikva, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.