Hastings v. Hastings

841 So. 2d 484, rev. denied by 857 So. 2d 196 (2003)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Hastings v. Hastings

Florida District Court of Appeal
841 So. 2d 484, rev. denied by 857 So. 2d 196 (2003)

SC
Play video

Facts

Jean Hastings (defendant) and Lawrence Hastings (plaintiff) divorced in 1953. The Hastingses had a child (defendant) who had been diagnosed with and begun treatment for Asperger’s syndrome at the age of eight years. In the divorce decree, Lawrence was ordered to pay child support until the child was 21 years old, the age of majority at the time. After the child turned 21 years old, Jean alone supported the child. In 2001, Lawrence filed a petition for a declaratory ruling with respect to his continuing support obligations, if any, for the child. The child was 50 years old at the time of the petition. Jean and the child filed a counterclaim, arguing that the child was entitled to support from Lawrence based on a Florida statute that, under a savings clause, reserved any common-law right to support for an adult child who was dependent due to mental or physical incapacity that had manifested while the child was a minor. The trial court granted summary judgment to Lawrence. Jean and the child appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Fletcher, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 810,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership