Hastings v. Hastings
Florida District Court of Appeal
841 So. 2d 484, rev. denied by 857 So. 2d 196 (2003)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Jean Hastings (defendant) and Lawrence Hastings (plaintiff) divorced in 1953. The Hastingses had a child (defendant) who had been diagnosed with and begun treatment for Asperger’s syndrome at the age of eight years. In the divorce decree, Lawrence was ordered to pay child support until the child was 21 years old, the age of majority at the time. After the child turned 21 years old, Jean alone supported the child. In 2001, Lawrence filed a petition for a declaratory ruling with respect to his continuing support obligations, if any, for the child. The child was 50 years old at the time of the petition. Jean and the child filed a counterclaim, arguing that the child was entitled to support from Lawrence based on a Florida statute that, under a savings clause, reserved any common-law right to support for an adult child who was dependent due to mental or physical incapacity that had manifested while the child was a minor. The trial court granted summary judgment to Lawrence. Jean and the child appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Fletcher, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.