Henderson v. Smith

915 P.2d 6 (1996)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Henderson v. Smith

Idaho Supreme Court
915 P.2d 6 (1996)

  • Written by Haley Gintis, JD

Facts

In 1981, Patricia Henderson (plaintiff) gave birth to a child. In 1992, Henderson petitioned the court for a determination that Vernon K. Smith (defendant) was the child’s biological father. At the time of the suit, Smith was an attorney who had been practicing in the area for over 20 years. The magistrate court ruled that Smith was the child’s biological father and ordered that he pay $373 per month in child support until the child reached age 18 or 19, depending on whether she pursued school. The court used the Idaho Child Support Guidelines (ICSG) to determine the appropriate child-support obligation, under which the obligation is based on the parent’s gross income from all revenue sources. Because no evidence of Smith’s monthly income was introduced, the court calculated the obligation by using the figure that Henderson had introduced, which was the average income of a local attorney with over 20 years of experience. The court determined that the average gross income was $3,500 per month and then ordered the monthly $373 obligation by deducting possible overhead and operating expenses. Smith appealed on the ground that the magistrate court had abused its discretion by basing the obligation on the average income of attorneys because no evidence was presented showing that Smith was earning this amount. The district court affirmed the magistrate court. Smith appealed to the Idaho Supreme Court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (McDevitt, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership