Hoak v. Hoak

370 S.E.2d 473 (1988)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Hoak v. Hoak

West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals
370 S.E.2d 473 (1988)

Facts

Rebecca Hoak (plaintiff) and Bruce Hoak (defendant) were married in 1980. At the time of their marriage, Bruce had completed his first year of medical school. Rebecca had a bachelor’s degree in horticulture and worked for a landscaping company but left that job to make more money in another job unrelated to her degree. Bruce continued in medical school, and Rebecca provided the main financial support for the family for the first few years of the marriage. Bruce graduated from medical school in 1983 and filed for divorce in 1984. The divorce decree provided that Bruce was to pay child support and pay Rebecca rehabilitative alimony but for two years only. Rebecca appealed the decree, alleging that Bruce’s medical degree should be considered marital property subject to equitable distribution.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Brotherton, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 812,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership