Supreme Court of Delaware
297 A.2d 39 (1972)
Husband W. (plaintiff) filed a petition against Wife W. (defendant), seeking a divorce on grounds of incompatibility. Not only did Wife W. put lye in Husband W.’s food, but she also tried to stab Husband W. with an ice pick. In turn, Husband W. locked Wife W. out of the house on a cold winter day, hit her over the head with a chair to the point of hospitalization on more than one occasion, threatened her with a piece of iron, and said that he would burn down the marital home. However, the trial court held that Husband W. had failed to prove that the marriage was irretrievably broken without possibility of reconciliation. Husband W. appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 217,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.