In re Clarke
United States Trademark Trial and Appeal Board
17 U.S.P.Q.2d 1238 (1990)
- Written by Carolyn Strutton, JD
Facts
Celia Clarke (plaintiff) owned a business called Osewez that produced embroidery yarn and thread. Osewez added a floral, nonfunctional scent to its yarn and thread as a distinguishing design feature. Osewez advertised the scented nature of the products, was the only source for scented embroidery yarn and thread, and consumers, dealers, and distributors had come to recognize Osewez as the source for scented embroidery yarn and thread. Clarke applied for trademark registration for the scent. The examining attorney rejected the application, on the grounds that the scent did not function to identify or distinguish Clarke’s product from other similar products. Clarke appealed the examiner’s decision.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Simms, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.