In re Marriage of Plummer

735 P.2d 165 (1987)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 37,500+ case briefs...

In re Marriage of Plummer

Colorado Supreme Court

735 P.2d 165 (1987)

Facts

In 1979 John R. Plummer (defendant) and Leavelle Plummer (plaintiff) divorced. The divorce decree did not include any order of child support for the Plummers’ two daughters, who were 19 years old and 17 years old. However, John supported the daughters until they each reached the age of 21. When the youngest daughter turned 21, she was in her third year of college. Leavelle filed an action against John for child support until the daughter finished school. The trial court ordered that John support the daughter until she completed her undergraduate degree. John appealed on the ground that a parent no longer has a duty to support his child once the child reaches the age of 21, absent evidence that the child is disabled or a court order stating otherwise. The court of appeals affirmed the trial court. The court of appeals held that requiring a parent to pay child support beyond the age of majority was permissible according to the Colorado Supreme Court in Koltay v. Koltay and the Uniform Dissolution of Marriage Act. John appealed to the Colorado Supreme Court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Vollack, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 631,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 631,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 37,500 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 631,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 37,500 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership