Court of Appeals of Washington
991 P.2d 1201 (Wash. Ct. App. 2000)
Martin Pollard and Joan Pollard Brookins were divorced with had two children. Martin had legal custody of the children. The divorce decree ordered Joan to pay child support. At the time of the divorce, Joan was employed full-time. Subsequently, Joan remarried and had two additional children with her new husband. Joan then quit her full-time job and took a part-time job, spending the rest of her time caring for her two children from her second marriage. Joan filed a petition to reduce her child-support obligations, given her decreased income. Martin argued that the court should impute income to Joan based on her prior full-time job for purposes of calculating her child-support obligation. The trial court declined to impute income to Joan and decreased her child-support obligations based on her new income level. Martin appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Schultheis, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 218,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.