In re Marriage of Recknor

138 Cal. App. 3d 539 (1982)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

In re Marriage of Recknor

California Court of Appeal
138 Cal. App. 3d 539 (1982)

  • Written by Haley Gintis, JD

Facts

In 1964, Eve Lynn Recknor (plaintiff) became pregnant with Ralph Recknor’s (defendant) child, and Ralph suggested that they marry. Eve told Ralph that she did not want to have a marriage ceremony because she had previously been married and her divorce was not final. However, upon Ralph’s persistence, the couple participated in a marriage ceremony. Eve’s divorce was finalized the following year. By 1980, the marriage between Eve and Ralph had deteriorated. Eve filed for a dissolution of the marriage and sought custody of the couple’s two kids, child support, spousal support, and attorney’s fees. In response, Ralph requested a court declaration of nullity of marriage. Ralph argued that the marriage was void because Eve’s first divorce was not finalized and that the marriage was voidable because Eve was already legally married when the marriage ceremony occurred. The trial court rejected Ralph’s arguments and entered an order requiring Ralph to pay spousal support and the attorney’s fees. Ralph appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Danielson, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership