In re O'Brien

367 B.R. 242 (2007)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

In re O'Brien

United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Massachusetts
367 B.R. 242 (2007)

Facts

O’Brien (defendant) engaged in post-divorce litigation with his ex-wife on modifications to and alleged breaches of a previously entered divorce decree and separation agreement. After a trial, the probate court found O’Brien and his ex-wife guilty of contempt related to the previously entered divorce decree and separation agreement. On December 2, 2005, the probate court issued a fee award for legal services provided by Stephen Crowne (plaintiff) and ordered O’Brien to pay Crowne from his retirement accounts. O’Brien filed a suit under Chapter 7 on December 7, 2005. At the time of the suit, Crowne had not received payment under the fee award. O’Brien claimed the retirement accounts as exempt in his Chapter 7 suit. Crowne did not file an objection to the exemption. Crowne did, however, file a relief-from-stay motion on the fee award, asking that the court hold that collection of the fee award from the retirement accounts was not subject to the automatic stay as a domestic-support obligation and that Crowne was entitled to collect the fee award from the retirement accounts. O’Brien opposed the motion.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Somma, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership