In re O'Brien
United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Massachusetts
367 B.R. 242 (2007)
- Written by Mary Katherine Cunningham, JD
Facts
O’Brien (defendant) engaged in post-divorce litigation with his ex-wife on modifications to and alleged breaches of a previously entered divorce decree and separation agreement. After a trial, the probate court found O’Brien and his ex-wife guilty of contempt related to the previously entered divorce decree and separation agreement. On December 2, 2005, the probate court issued a fee award for legal services provided by Stephen Crowne (plaintiff) and ordered O’Brien to pay Crowne from his retirement accounts. O’Brien filed a suit under Chapter 7 on December 7, 2005. At the time of the suit, Crowne had not received payment under the fee award. O’Brien claimed the retirement accounts as exempt in his Chapter 7 suit. Crowne did not file an objection to the exemption. Crowne did, however, file a relief-from-stay motion on the fee award, asking that the court hold that collection of the fee award from the retirement accounts was not subject to the automatic stay as a domestic-support obligation and that Crowne was entitled to collect the fee award from the retirement accounts. O’Brien opposed the motion.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Somma, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.