In Re Ockerlund Construction Co.
United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
308 B.R. 325 (2004)
- Written by Philip Glass, JD
Facts
MB Financial Bank (MB) seized the funds in a bank account owned by Chapter 11 debtor Ockerlund Construction Company (Ockerlund Co.) (debtor) to satisfy Ockerlund Co.’s delinquent loan repayments. While MB and Ockerlund Co. were still negotiating over the restoration of funds to Ockerlund Co.’s account, Ockerlund Co.’s principal officer, Craig Ockerlund, advanced unauthorized unsecured postpetition funds to Ockerlund Co. for the costs of a school-construction project and postpetition employee-insurance premiums. Ockerlund Co. framed these advances as fulfilling emergency obligations and thus classifiable as administrative expenses (i.e., operationally necessary postpetition expenses incurred by the debtor). Ockerlund Co. thereafter filed a motion to repay Craig Ockerlund for the advance. Ockerlund Co. insisted that a court order authorizing the advance could not have been obtained beforehand. However, the motion failed to explain the reason for this purported impossibility. MB supported the motion, while Midwesco Services (creditor) and bonding company Atlantic Mutual opposed it.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Cox, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 824,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.