In Re Roman Catholic Archbishop of Portland

2005 Bankr. LEXIS 42 (2005)

From our private database of 46,600+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

In Re Roman Catholic Archbishop of Portland

United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Oregon
2005 Bankr. LEXIS 42 (2005)

  • Written by Philip Glass, JD

Facts

On November 19, 2004, the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Oregon authorized the appointment of a future claims representative tasked with representing the interest of child-abuse victims whose claims arose out of the prepetition conduct of the Roman Catholic Archbishop of Portland (RCAP) (debtor). The RCAP contended that the future claims representative should represent only the interests of minors and victims suffering from repressed memory. The tort-claimants committee averred that the class should include those with memory but incapable of discovering resultant harm despite exercising reasonable care. The court determined the scope of the class of RCAP victims subject to future claims representation.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Perris, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 834,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 834,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,600 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 834,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,600 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership