In re Schneider

173 Wash. 2d 353, 268 P.3d 215 (2011)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

In re Schneider

Washington Supreme Court
173 Wash. 2d 353, 268 P.3d 215 (2011)

Facts

Carol Schneider (plaintiff) and Jeffrey Almgren (defendant) had two children, Amanda and D.J.A. Schneider and Almgren divorced in 1997 in Nebraska, and the dissolution decree ordered Almgren to pay child support during the children’s minority. In Nebraska, the age of majority was 19, and child support did not extend past the age of minority unless the parties agreed otherwise. Schneider, Amanda, and D.J.A. moved to Washington state. In 2009, when Amanda was 18 and preparing to enroll in college, Schneider moved the Washington court to upwardly modify the Nebraska child-support order to provide support for Amanda’s postsecondary education. Almgren moved the Washington court for a downward modification in his support of D.J.A., because Almgren had lost his job. When Almgren filed his motion, he submitted to personal jurisdiction in Washington and established Washington’s jurisdiction to modify the Nebraska order under the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act (UIFSA). The trial court granted Schneider’s motion, extending Almgren’s child support until Amanda reached the age of 23, the upper age limit of postsecondary-education support in Washington. The trial court denied Almgren’s motion. Almgren appealed, arguing that the Washington court did not have the authority under the UIFSA to extend support past the age of majority in Nebraska. The appellate court affirmed the trial court’s ruling, and Almgren appealed again.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Wiggins, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership