In the Interest of J.L. v. D.L.
Wisconsin Court of Appeals
Appeal No. 2020AP330 (2022)

- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
In May 2015, Tamara gave birth to a child named Jasmine. Tamara and Jasmine lived with Danielle (plaintiff) in 2015 but moved out for a period until November 2016 when Tamara was arrested and Jasmine moved back in with Danielle. At that point, Jasmine began living with Danielle again. After Tamara got out of jail, she and Danielle had a falling out about Jasmine’s care. In September 2019, Danielle filed a petition for permanent guardianship of Jasmine. At a guardianship hearing, Tamara told the circuit court that she wanted Jasmine to be placed with Tamara’s mother, Stephanie. Because Tamara did not want to take custody of Jasmine, the circuit court concluded that a determination on Tamara’s fitness to be a parent was not needed. The circuit court granted guardianship to Danielle based on only the best-interests-of-the-child standard. Stephanie appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.