In the Matter of Crown/Vista Energy Project

652 A.2d 212 (1995)

From our private database of 46,200+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

In the Matter of Crown/Vista Energy Project

New Jersey Superior Court
652 A.2d 212 (1995)

Facts

The Clean Air Act was a federal law that set emissions standards for certain facilities. The act required states to implement plans for enforcing emissions standards. Under 1990 amendments to the act, acceptable levels of one pollutant decreased from 50 tons per year to 25 tons per year. The amended act required states to update the implementation plans by November 15, 1992. Recognizing that many states would fail to meet this deadline and consistent with a savings clause in the 1990 amendments, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued guidance providing that if a state failed to meet the November 15, 1992, deadline, the state could review plans that were submitted before this date under the pre-1990 regulations. The New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) (defendant) issued draft rules to update the state’s plan, which went into effect in 1993. Consistent with the EPA’s guidance, the rules grandfathered in applications submitted before November 1992. On February 28, 1992, the Crown/Vista Energy Project submitted an application to construct a new power facility. Based on its regulations, on October 21, 1992, the NJDEP determined that the application was complete and eventually granted the permit. As part of the permitting process, the NJDEP concluded that the emissions level would be about 49 tons per year, consistent with the pre-1990 regulations. A group of citizens (plaintiffs) challenged the grant of the application. Among other arguments, the citizens claimed that the NJDEP was incorrect in grandfathering in the application and reviewing it under the pre-1990 regulation level of 50 tons per year instead of the new 25-tons-per-year level.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 791,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 791,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 791,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,200 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership