In the Matter of Vuitton et Fils S.A.

606 F.2d 1 (1979)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

In the Matter of Vuitton et Fils S.A.

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
606 F.2d 1 (1979)

AR

Facts

Vuitton et Fils S.A. (plaintiff) sought a writ of mandamus directing the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York to issue an ex parte temporary restraining order. Vuitton complained that Dame Belt & Bag Co., Inc., was producing counterfeit Vuitton merchandise. Vuitton asked the district court for an ex parte temporary restraining order because in its experience in commencing 84 actions against counterfeiters, the moment a counterfeiter learned he or she was about to be enjoined, he or she simply transferred his or her inventory to another counterfeiter. At that point, Vuitton could not pursue its claim or protect its trademark. The district court refused to grant an ex parte order because Vuitton was capable of giving notice to Dame and courts frowned on giving temporary restraining orders without notice. Because the district court’s decision was not appealable, Vuitton brought suit in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 816,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership