Janda v. Janda

984 So. 2d 434 (2007)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Janda v. Janda

Alabama Court of Civil Appeals
984 So. 2d 434 (2007)

  • Written by Liz Nakamura, JD

Facts

Antoinette Walters Janda (plaintiff) and Jiri Janda (defendant) were married in June 2007 after a short courtship. As a result of the marriage, Jiri, a citizen of the Czech Republic, was able to obtain a green card as a permanent resident alien. The Jandas cohabitated in Antoinette’s home after the marriage but did not share a bedroom and never engaged in sexual relations. Initially, Antoinette believed cultural differences or Jiri’s claimed dislike of her current weight was the cause. However, after 20 months of marriage, Antoinette realized that Jiri married her without any intention of engaging in sexual relations. Antoinette filed a petition for annulment in February 2007, and Jiri counterclaimed for divorce, stating he would be deported if the marriage were annulled. The trial court entered an order annulling the marriage after a hearing, reasoning that the parties had never consummated the marriage and had acted more like roommates than a married couple. Jiri appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Moore, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership