Jenkins v. Jenkins

991 S.W.2d 440 (1999)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Jenkins v. Jenkins

Texas Court of Appeals
991 S.W.2d 440 (1999)

  • Written by Whitney Kamerzel , JD

Facts

Michael Jenkins (defendant) and Bee Jenkins were married and subsequently divorced. They signed an agreement incident to divorce, and Michael agreed to make monthly alimony payments to Bee. The trial court approved the agreement and incorporated it into the divorce decree. Michael stopped making the alimony payments, and more than two years later, Bee’s bankruptcy trustee (plaintiff) moved to enforce the agreement. Michael argued that the trustee’s claim was barred by the Texas Family Code’s two-year statute of limitations to bring a claim for the division of property that was not in existence at the time of an original divorce decree. The trial court held that the trustee was not barred by the statute of limitations. Michael appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Brigham, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership