John B. v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County
California Supreme Court
137 P.3d 153 (2006)
Bridget B. (plaintiff) and John B. (defendant) met in 1998. John presented himself as monogamous and healthy. The couple was married in 2000. A few months after their marriage, Bridget became ill. She learned she was HIV positive. John was then tested and found to be HIV positive. Bridget sued John. She alleged that John had unprotected sex with multiple men both before and during their marriage, causing him to become infected with HIV, which he either knowingly or negligently transmitted to her. John argued that because he did not have actual knowledge of his infection, he did not have a duty of care to prevent transmitting HIV to Bridget.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Baxter, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 726,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 726,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,700 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.