John Doe CS v. Capuchin Franciscan Friars

520 F. Supp. 2d 1124 (2007)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

John Doe CS v. Capuchin Franciscan Friars

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
520 F. Supp. 2d 1124 (2007)

  • Written by Liz Nakamura, JD

Facts

The Capuchin Franciscan Friars (CFF) (defendant) operated Cardinal Ritter Preparatory High School (Cardinal Ritter). CFF hired Father Thaddeus Posey to teach at Cardinal Ritter knowing he had a history of sexually abusing minors. Posey sexually abused several minor students at Cardinal Ritter, including John Doe CS (plaintiff). CFF did not report Posey to law enforcement. Doe sued CFF, alleging that (1) CFF ratified Posey’s actions and was vicariously responsible for Posey abusing Doe; (2) CFF breached its fiduciary duty to Doe; (3) CFF defrauded Doe by failing to disclose Posey’s conduct when Doe signed up to attend Cardinal Ritter; (4) CFF knowingly placing Posey in the position to abuse Doe constituted intentional infliction of emotional distress (IIED); and (5) CFF was negligent because it failed to fire, report, or properly supervise Posey. CFF moved to dismiss all claims, arguing that, under the First Amendment, religious institutions cannot be held liable for the actions of clergy.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Mummert, III, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 830,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership