Jones v. Jones
Supreme Court of South Dakota
542 N.W.2d 119 (S.D. 1996)
Kevin Jones (plaintiff) and Dawn Jones (defendant) were married. Kevin was Native American, and Dawn was Caucasian. The couple had three children. Kevin filed a petition for divorce and custody of the children. To support his petition, Kevin argued that the children should continue to be exposed to their Native American heritage. The trial court granted Kevin custody. In doing so, the trial court stated that custody determinations must be racially neutral, but also evaluated Kevin’s willingness and ability to expose the children to their Native American heritage. Dawn appealed, arguing that the trial court violated her right to equal protection by awarding custody based on race.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Johns, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 174,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.