Judge Rotenberg Educational Center, Inc. v. FDA

3 F.4th 390 (2021)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Judge Rotenberg Educational Center, Inc. v. FDA

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
3 F.4th 390 (2021)

Facts

The Judge Rotenberg Educational Center (the center) (plaintiff) was a Massachusetts treatment facility for patients with severe mental disabilities, including conditions that manifested through aggressive and potentially severe self-harming behaviors. The center was the only facility in the United States that used electric-shock therapy to treat patients who exhibited the self-injurious or aggressive behaviors. The center manufactured its own electrical-stimulation devices for use in electric-shock treatments. Before the center could administer electric-shock treatment, Massachusetts required peer review of the treatment decision, certification from multiple healthcare practitioners that the treatment was not contraindicated and that no other treatments would be effective, ratification by a human-rights committee, and approval by a state court. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) (defendant) regulated aversive conditioning devices, including electrical-stimulation devices, as Class II devices under the federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA). Class II devices included medical devices that the FDA considered reasonably safe and effective when subject to certain conditions. In 2020, the FDA promulgated a rule banning electrical-stimulation devices for the treatment of self-injurious or aggressive behavior. The FDA justified the rule by pointing to evidence that treatment with the devices harmed patients and a lack of conclusive evidence that the devices effectively reduced self-injurious or aggressive behavior in the long term. The center challenged the FDA’s rule in the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Sentelle, J.)

Dissent (Srinivasan, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership