K.C. Roofing Center v. On Top Roofing, Inc.
Missouri Court of Appeals
807 S.W.2d 545 (1991)
- Written by Craig Conway, LLM
Facts
Over the course of several years, Russell and Carol Nugent were principal owners of a number of small roofing companies solely established by Russell. When one of Russell’s companies went out of business, he created a new business using the same address and telephone number. Kansas City Roofing Center (KCRC) and Lumberman’s Mutual Wholesale Company (Lumberman’s) (collectively, plaintiffs) advanced approximately $45,000 in roofing supplies to Russell’s latest business, On Top Roofing, Inc. (On Top) (defendant). When On Top failed to pay for the supplies, KCRC and Lumberman’s filed suit against On Top and the Nugents in their individual capacities as the owners. At the time On Top requested the roofing supplies, Russell Nugent was aware that the business had no funds to pay plaintiffs, nor did it have the money to pay the other previous suppliers who had advanced approximately $100,000 worth of materials to On Top. Following a bench trial, the trial court “pierced the corporate veil” of On Top and held Russell personally liable for the monies owed to plaintiffs. The Nugents and On Top appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Kennedy, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.