From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.
Kelm v. Kelm
Ohio Supreme Court
92 Ohio St. 3d 223, 749 N.E.2d 299 (2001)
- Written by Eric Miller, JD
Facts
Russell Kelm and Amy Kelm obtained a divorce in the county court of common pleas. That judgment incorporated a parenting plan under which both parties agreed to submit future disputes over child custody or visitation to arbitration. In a previous judgment stemming from the Kelm divorce proceedings, the Ohio Supreme Court held that matters pertaining to child-support payments could be resolved through arbitration. The question of whether child custody and visitation were also appropriate for arbitration subsequently became a disputed issue, returning the case to the Ohio Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Sweeney, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
