From our private database of 33,600+ case briefs...
Kelm v. Kelm
Ohio Supreme Court
92 Ohio St. 3d 223, 749 N.E.2d 299 (2001)
Russell Kelm and Amy Kelm obtained a divorce in the county court of common pleas. That judgment incorporated a parenting plan under which both parties agreed to submit future disputes over child custody or visitation to arbitration. In a previous judgment stemming from the Kelm divorce proceedings, the Ohio Supreme Court held that matters pertaining to child-support payments could be resolved through arbitration. The question of whether child custody and visitation were also appropriate for arbitration subsequently became a disputed issue, returning the case to the Ohio Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Sweeney, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 603,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 603,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 33,600 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.