Kirk v. First American Title Insurance Co.
California Court of Appeal
183 Cal. App. 4th 776, 108 Cal. Rptr. 3d 620 (2010)
- Written by Samantha Arena, JD
Facts
Four class actions were brought against First American Title Insurance Company. The Bernheim Law Firm (plaintiff) and the Kick Law Firm (plaintiff) represented the plaintiffs. Bryan Cave, LLP represented First American. In 2007, Berheim and Kick spoke with Gary Cohen, soliciting his consulting services in the lawsuits. During the discussion, Bernheim and Kick disclosed confidential information regarding the lawsuits to Cohen. Cohen declined the consultant position. In 2008, Cohen joined the law firm of Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthel, LLP. Thereafter, Bernheim and Kick contacted Cohen to again request his consulting services. Cohen turned down the job, stating that he could not assist because Sonnenschein represented First American. The following month, First American replaced Bryan Cave, with Sonnenschein as counsel. Sonnenschein established an ethical screen around Cohen, issuing a firm-wide memorandum prohibiting Cohen from working on the class actions, accessing related documents, and receiving fees from any work related to the actions, and prohibiting other attorneys from discussing the cases with Cohen. Bernheim and Kick moved to disqualify Sonnenschein. The trial court granted the motion, finding that Bernheim and Kick disclosed confidential information to Cohen when they solicited his consulting services, and concluding that, because Cohen possessed such disqualifying confidential information, vicarious disqualification of Sonnenschein is automatic, regardless of the ethical screening wall. First American and Sonnenschein appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Croskey, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 795,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.