Lauro Lines s.r.l. v. Chasser
United States Supreme Court
490 U.S. 495 (1989)
Chasser and other individuals (plaintiffs) were passengers aboard Lauro’s cruise ship (defendant) when it was hijacked by terrorists, and brought suit in the District Court for the Southern District of New York against Lauro for injuries sustained and the wrongful death of another passenger. Citing a forum selection clause printed on the tickets, Lauro moved to dismiss. The district court held that the ticket did not give passengers reasonable notice and denied the motion to dismiss. Lauro sought to appeal to the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, which dismissed Lauro’s appeal on the ground that the district court’s decision was interlocutory, did not fall within the exception for collateral final orders, and was thus not appealable.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Brennan, J.)
Concurrence (Scalia, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 166,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.