From our private database of 26,900+ case briefs...
Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. Wetzel
United States Supreme Court
424 U.S. 737 (1976)
Wetzel (plaintiff) brought suit against Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. (Liberty) (defendant) in the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania, alleging that Liberty’s insurance benefits and maternity leave regulations violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Wetzel requested injunctive relief ordering Liberty to cease its discriminatory practices and establish non-discriminatory practices and damages including back pay and exemplary damages. The district court found for Wetzel but granted none of the requested relief. Liberty appealed to the court of appeals, which affirmed the district court’s judgment, and then petitioned the United States Supreme Court for certiorari.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Rehnquist, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 541,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 541,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 26,900 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.